ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 805 vs 102
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 168
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 vs 329
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 vs 329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8300

• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 64 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	805 102
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	288 168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2113 329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2113 329

Compare specifications (specs)