ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- 4x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 vs 323
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 70
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 vs 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 70 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- 10.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6073 vs 602
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3233 vs 2113
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3233 vs 2113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6073 vs 602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 vs 2113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 | 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 70 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 602 | 6073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 | 3233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 | 3233 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Redwood | G94B |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $43.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1420 | 1421 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $43.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 48 |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5670 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
