NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1634 vs 694
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.25 vs 3.914
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 1129
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 1129

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 15.5 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
• 5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 vs 539
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 187
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 929
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 vs 1524
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 929
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 vs 1524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	539 803
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1634 694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.25 3.914
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	929 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1210 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 2113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	929 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1210 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 2113

Compare specifications (specs)