AMD Radeon HD 6520G vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6520G and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6520G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 748 vs 693
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 1129
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 1129
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3134 vs 2113
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3134 vs 2113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 vs 14 January 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 748 vs 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 vs 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 vs 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3134 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3134 vs 2113 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 400 vs 320
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 644
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 644
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 82
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 300
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 320 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 644 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 644 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 82 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6520G
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6520G | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 748 | 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 644 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 644 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3134 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3134 | 2113 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 82 | 291 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 300 | 801 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6520G | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Llano | Redwood |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1425 | 1427 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 400 |
| Transistor count | 1000 Million | 627 million |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
