Apple M1 Ultra 48-core vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Ultra 48-core and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1296 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 3072 vs 48
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1296 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
| Name | Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 95143 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 177 | 178 |
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Code name | TU104 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.925 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 48 | 3072 |
| Render output units | 192 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
