Apple M1 Ultra 48-core vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Ultra 48-core and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 885 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 94967 vs 76247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94967 vs 76247 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- 48x more pipelines: 2304 vs 48
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 120 Watt
Pipelines | 2304 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94967 | 76247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11565 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 178 | 180 |
Architecture | Turing | |
Code name | TU106 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 885 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.925 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 48 | 2304 |
Render output units | 192 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 115 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |