Apple M1 Ultra 48-core vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Ultra 48-core and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 885 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 95143 vs 75589
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 95143 vs 75589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- 48x more pipelines: 2304 vs 48
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 120 Watt
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Ultra 48-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 95143 | 75589 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11546 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 Ultra 48-core | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 18 Mar 2022 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 177 | 175 |
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Code name | TU106 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.925 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 48 | 2304 |
| Render output units | 192 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
