Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 166.4 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57896 vs 38863
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57896 vs 38863 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57896 | 38863 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7222 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
Code name | DG2-256 | TU117 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 363 | 364 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |