Intel Arc Graphics 112EU vs Intel Arc Graphics 48EU

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Graphics 112EU and Intel Arc Graphics 48EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU

Intel Arc Graphics 48EU

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU

Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.9x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 43.20 GTexel/s
2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384

Boost clock speed	2200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Texture fill rate	123.2 GTexel/s vs 43.20 GTexel/s
Pipelines	896 vs 384

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 65 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	28 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc Graphics 112EU	Intel Arc Graphics 48EU
Essentials
Architecture	Xe-LPG	Xe-LPG
Code name	Meteor Lake GT1	Meteor Lake GT1
Launch date	14 Dec 2023	14 Dec 2023
Place in performance rating	not rated	not rated
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	1800 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Pipelines	896	384
Pixel fill rate	52.80 GPixel/s	14.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	123.2 GTexel/s	43.20 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	28 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	Portable Device Dependent
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP	IGP
Interface	Ring Bus	Ring Bus
API support
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	System Dependent	System Dependent
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Memory type	System Shared	System Shared