Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 262.4 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
| Launch date | 6 Jun 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 708
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 8994
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 63485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 708 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 8994 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 63485 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A60
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc Pro A60 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8994 | 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63485 | 88251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc Pro A60 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Code name | DG2-256 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 6 Jun 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 145 | 134 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 131.2 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
