Intel GMA 600 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 600 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 600
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 55 nm
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 55 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel GMA 600
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Name | Intel GMA 600 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel GMA 600 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | PowerVR SGX535 | TeraScale |
Code name | Lincroft | RS880 |
Launch date | 4 May 2010 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 982 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 55 nm |
Transistor count | 140 million | 181 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | ES 2.0 | 3.3 |