Intel GMA 600 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 600 and AMD FirePro RG220A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 55 nm
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 55 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro RG220A
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel GMA 600 | AMD FirePro RG220A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | PowerVR SGX535 | TeraScale |
Code name | Lincroft | RV711 |
Launch date | 4 May 2010 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 55 nm |
Transistor count | 140 million | 242 million |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Pipelines | 80 | |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | ES 2.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |