Intel GMA 900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP

Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 900 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 900

  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 333 MHz vs 275 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
Core clock speed 333 MHz vs 275 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm vs 150 nm

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel GMA 900 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP

Essentials

Architecture Generation 3.0 Rankine
Code name Grantsdale NV34 A1
Launch date 1 June 2004 25 May 2004
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 333 MHz 275 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 150 nm
Texture fill rate 1.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt
Transistor count 45 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DMS-59

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 AGP 8x
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 9.0c 9.0a
OpenGL 1.4 1.5 (2.1)

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 500 MHz
Memory type DDR

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare Intel GMA 900 with others

Intel GMA 900 Intel
GMA 900
vs ATI FireGL V5100 ATI
FireGL V5100
Intel GMA 900 Intel
GMA 900
vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Intel GMA 900 Intel
GMA 900
vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 280 AGP