Intel GMA 900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 900 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 900
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 333 MHz vs 275 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
Core clock speed | 333 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel GMA 900 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 3.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Grantsdale | NV37 |
Launch date | 1 June 2004 | 25 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 333 MHz | 275 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.1 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Transistor count | 45 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 1.4 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR |