Intel GMA 950 vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 950 and ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 950
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 130 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 425 MHz vs 166 MHz
| Core clock speed | 425 MHz vs 166 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel GMA 950 | ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 3.5 | R400 |
| Code name | Lakeport | R420 |
| Launch date | 1 May 2005 | 27 April 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 166 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.4 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 160 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
