Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 25.3x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 56
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 18.7x more pipelines: 112 vs 6
- 32.9x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 1039
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 1039 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 213 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1039 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1039 | 3304 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 56 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 213 | 454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Sandy Bridge GT1 | G92 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 718 | 1063 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 10.2 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
