Intel HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 400 and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 8.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 134.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 4 February 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 8.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- 2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 320 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 650 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1069
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1069 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 400
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 400 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1069 | 2572 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 400 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Braswell GT1 | Cedar |
Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 4 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1706 | 1606 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 640 MHz | 650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 320 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 8.4 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L | DDR2 |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |