Intel HD Graphics 400 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 400 and AMD Radeon R7 265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 13 February 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 7x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 8.4 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 96
- 14.1x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 640 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 8.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 265
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 400 | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1069 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 400 | AMD Radeon R7 265 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Braswell GT1 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1706 | 1708 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 640 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 320 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 8.4 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
