Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 230 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 140 nm
- 43.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 8
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 152
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 17 March 2004 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 230 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 140 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 152 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
- 219x more texture fill rate: 920 MTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 920 MTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | NV34 B1 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 17 March 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1132 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $36.99 | |
Price now | $36.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.30 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 230 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 140 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 920 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |