NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 436 vs 346
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2102 vs 538
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 vs 155.638
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 vs 12.009
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 754
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1492
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 754
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1492
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 vs 14 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 436 vs 346 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2102 vs 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 vs 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 vs 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 vs 1492 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 715 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 192 vs 127
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 4.233
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.519
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 7.151
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 vs 127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 vs 4.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 vs 0.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 7.151 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 436 | 346 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 | 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2102 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1505 | 1506 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | 1050 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,200 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Quick Sync |