NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 30.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 21.7x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 vs 8.712
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 vs 155.638
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 vs 7.36
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 vs 12.009
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 vs 754
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 vs 1492
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 vs 2392
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 vs 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 vs 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 vs 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 vs 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 vs 2392 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.785
- 24.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 31.3
- 34.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 43.4
- 26.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 91.5
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 vs 0.785 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 43.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 91.5 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31.3 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 43.4 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 91.5 | 2392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1504 | 1506 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |