Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 6.4x more texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
• 128x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 64 MB
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 53
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 49
• 12.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1122 vs 88
• 12.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1122 vs 88

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 53
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	81 49
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 88
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 88

Compare specifications (specs)