Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce G103M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 12 vs 8
  • 5.6x better floating-point performance: 144.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 63
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 34
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 1 September 2009
Texture fill rate 9 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 12 vs 8
Floating-point performance 144.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 299 vs 63
PassMark - G2D Mark 81 vs 34

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G103M

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed 640 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G103M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
63
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
81
34
Name Intel HD Graphics 500 NVIDIA GeForce G103M
PassMark - G3D Mark 299 63
PassMark - G2D Mark 81 34
Geekbench - OpenCL 911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 35.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.215
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1122
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1122

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 500 NVIDIA GeForce G103M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Tesla
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 G98
Launch date 1 September 2015 1 September 2009
Place in performance rating 1652 1655
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 640 MHz
Floating-point performance 144.0 gflops 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 12 8
Texture fill rate 9 GTexel / s 5.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR2
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 8 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync