Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce G103M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 12 vs 8
• 5.6x better floating-point performance: 144.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 298 vs 63
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 80 vs 34

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G103M

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G103M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	298 63
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	80 34

Compare specifications (specs)