Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 169
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 28
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1122 vs 502
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1122 vs 502

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 169
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	81 28
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 502

Compare specifications (specs)