Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 76.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 128x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 131
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 42
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1397
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 32 vs 24
| Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 42 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | G84 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1621 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 8.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 530 with others
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
