Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 166.832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 18 June 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 166.832 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 7x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 594
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 230
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 vs 2262
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 vs 3.422
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 781
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 754
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1397
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 781
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 754
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1397
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 vs 233
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 vs 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 vs 3.422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 vs 233 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 166.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | 327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 18 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1478 | 1311 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |