Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 15.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 vs 51
- 16x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 754 vs 47
- 23.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 vs 59.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 vs 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 vs 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 vs 59.6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- 10.9x more core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.243 vs 3.422
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 vs 195.811
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 781
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 754
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 vs 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 vs 195.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 1397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 589 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2272 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 393.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 2916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 59.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1486 | 1489 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5500 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
