Intel HD Graphics 615 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 vs 591
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3042 vs 2266
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 vs 3.422
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 vs 195.811
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 vs 781
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1128 vs 754
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1397
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 781
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 vs 754
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 vs 591 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3042 vs 2266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 vs 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 vs 195.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 186
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 186 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 233 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3042 | 2266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1485 | 1486 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 615 with others
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5500
