Intel HD Graphics 615 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 708 vs 591
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3041 vs 2266
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 vs 3.422
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 vs 195.811
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 vs 781
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1128 vs 754
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1397
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 781
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 vs 754
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 708 vs 591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3041 vs 2266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 vs 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 vs 195.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 186
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 186 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 708 | 591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3041 | 2266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | 195.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT2 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1483 | 1484 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |