Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 29 May 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 9.9x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 594
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 230
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 vs 2262
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 vs 3.422
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 vs 195.811
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 781
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 vs 754
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2153 vs 1397
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 781
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 vs 754
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2153 vs 1397
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 vs 233
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 vs 594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 vs 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 vs 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 vs 195.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 vs 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 vs 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 vs 233 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 291.627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | 513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 29 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1478 | 1270 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Price now | $94.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |