Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 1673
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 1673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 3 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 vs 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 128x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 24
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5516 vs 2264
- 6.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16608 vs 2427
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 vs 1598
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5516 vs 2264 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16608 vs 2427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 5516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2427 | 16608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 1849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 3 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 743 | 746 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 2x 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |