Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 18 February 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3342 vs 2264
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 463
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9284 vs 2427
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1598
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3342 vs 2264 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 vs 463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9284 vs 2427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 3342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 511 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2427 | 9284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 3704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GM107 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 748 | 749 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |