Intel HD Graphics 6000 vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 6000 and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 48 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 875 vs 738
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 268
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1019
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1019
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 1668
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 875 vs 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 268 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4035 vs 3519
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4035 vs 3519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 6000
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 875 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 | 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3519 | 4035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 6000 | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1126 | 1205 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |