Intel HD Graphics 6000 vs AMD Radeon E6760
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 6000 and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1225 vs 820
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1225 vs 820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 2 May 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1225 vs 820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1225 vs 820 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 273
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 vs 3519
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1363
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1363
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 3259
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 vs 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 vs 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 vs 3259 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | AMD Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 875 | 877 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 | 485 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3519 | 9761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1225 | 820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1225 | 820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 3528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 3528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 293.065 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.002 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 6000 | AMD Radeon E6760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Turks |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 2 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1126 | 1129 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
| Price now | $239.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||