Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 13.1x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 64 MB
- 307.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 3
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 October 2001 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 116 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kelvin |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | NV20 A5 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 October 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1333 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 1.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |