Intel HD Graphics 620 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 14x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 11.2x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
- 10.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 90
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 212
- 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 328
- 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 14 May 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 90 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 90 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | M72 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1331 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
PowerPlay 7.0 |