Intel HD Graphics 630 vs ATI Radeon 9600 TX
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and ATI Radeon 9600 TX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 297 MHz
- 11.6x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 128 MB
- 61.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 18
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 138
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 7 October 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 297 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 128 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 vs 18 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9600 TX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9600 TX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 18 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 138 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9600 TX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 8 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | R300 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 7 October 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1213 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 297 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 110 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | Floppy | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 540 MHz | |

