Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 M460

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1111 vs 1073
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 204
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 19.679
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.572
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1767
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2772
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1767
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2772

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 96% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 vs 4580
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.673 vs 312.246
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.024 vs 20.404
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.168 vs 32.567
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1859
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1859

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111 1073
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 204
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4580 4999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 19.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 358.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 30.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 85.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2772

Compare specifications (specs)