Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 21.2x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 128 MB
- 92.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 12
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 138
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 6 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 vs 12 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 12 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rankine |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | NV34 A2 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1214 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Length | 171 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 650 MHz |