Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 18 May 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 27.948
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 312.246
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.795
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 20.404
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 32.567
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 32.567 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1113 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4560 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 41.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 726.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 3.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 30.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 155.196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1230 | 1247 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 52.24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz |