Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 18 May 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 27.948
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 312.246
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.795
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 20.404
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 32.567
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 32.567 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 41.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 726.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 3.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 30.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 155.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1217 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 52.24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 630 with others
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
