Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GRID M3-3020

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 18 May 2016
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020

  • 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
  • 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
  • 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
  • Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 27.948
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 312.246
  • Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.795
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 20.404
  • 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 32.567
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed 1306 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,672 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.997 vs 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 726.846 vs 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.442 vs 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.991 vs 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 155.196 vs 32.567

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.948
41.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
312.246
726.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.795
3.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20.404
30.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
32.567
155.196
Name Intel HD Graphics 630 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
PassMark - G3D Mark 1113
PassMark - G2D Mark 268
Geekbench - OpenCL 4560
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.948 41.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 312.246 726.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.795 3.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.404 30.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 32.567 155.196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 388

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 630 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Maxwell
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 GM107
Launch date 30 August 2016 18 May 2016
Place in performance rating 1230 1247
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1306 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 1033 MHz
Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops 1,672 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 640
Texture fill rate 27.6 GTexel / s 52.24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,870 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 83.2 GB / s
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz