Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 465
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1673
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 3 May 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 vs 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 vs 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 605
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16270 vs 3385
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 vs 8.915
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.114 vs 146.479
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 vs 1.178
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.836 vs 10.689
- 14.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 vs 6.64
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 605 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 vs 3385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 vs 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 vs 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 vs 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 vs 6.64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 5590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3385 | 16270 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 46.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 930.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 3.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 29.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 97.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 3 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 685 | 737 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P4600 with others
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
