NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Intel HD Graphics P4600

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2.2x more core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 350 MHz
7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4324 vs 605
3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 vs 3405
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 vs 8.915
5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 vs 146.479
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.73 vs 1.178
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 vs 10.689
10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.194 vs 6.64
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 3342
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 3342

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 1 June 2013
Core clock speed	771 MHz vs 350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4324 vs 605
Geekbench - OpenCL	12186 vs 3405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.016 vs 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063 vs 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.73 vs 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588 vs 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.194 vs 6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 784 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 503
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 3311
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 3311

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 784 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	84 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	963 vs 503
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3345 vs 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3345 vs 3311

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4324

605

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

503

963

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12186

3405

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.016

8.915

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

736.063

146.479

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.73

1.178

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.588

10.689

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.194

6.64

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3345

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3345

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark	4324	605
PassMark - G2D Mark	503	963
Geekbench - OpenCL	12186	3405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.016	8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063	146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.73	1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588	10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.194	6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3311	3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3311	3345
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	Intel HD Graphics P4600
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 7.5
Code name	GK104	Haswell GT2
Launch date	22 July 2014	1 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$854.99
Place in performance rating	702	682
Price now	$446.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	11.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	784 MHz	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	771 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	1344
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	108 Watt	84 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	392 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5