AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs Intel HD Graphics P4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 4x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 8.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 605
• 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22636 vs 3385
• 11.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 8.915
• 12x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 146.479
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 1.178
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 10.689
• 92.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 6.64

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 371
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1724
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4979 605
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 963
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22636 3385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.628 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1762.559 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.26 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.313 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	617.099 6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3345

Compare specifications (specs)