Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs AMD FirePro S9000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 561
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 24 August 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 561 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 605
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.541 vs 8.915
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 275.278 vs 146.479
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.886 vs 1.178
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.049 vs 10.689
- 13.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.842 vs 6.64
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3342
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 vs 605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.541 vs 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.278 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.886 vs 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.049 vs 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 vs 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 5059 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 561 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 9.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 275.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 1.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 30.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 91.842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD FirePro S9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 24 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 684 | 685 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P4600 with others
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3450
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
IntelHD Graphics P4600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
