Intel HD Graphics P530 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 941 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1161 vs 1012
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 150
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1987
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 941 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1161 vs 1012 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 vs 150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 vs 1987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 vs 1987 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5258 vs 4538
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 767
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 767
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1158
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 vs 4538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1161 | 1012 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 | 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4538 | 5258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 1987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 1987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM108 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1200 | 1202 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
