Intel HD Graphics P530 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1155 vs 1086
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 252
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4601 vs 2914
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1892
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1892
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1155 vs 1086 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 252 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4601 vs 2914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 vs 1892 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- 2x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 861 vs 767
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 861 vs 767
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1443 vs 1158
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1443 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1155 | 1086 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | 252 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4601 | 2914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 1892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1189 | 1435 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Price now | $79 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P530 with others
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M520
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
IntelUHD Graphics
