Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A310 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A310

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1245 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 326

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 64.00 GTexel/s
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36290 vs 30574
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6222 vs 5437

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A310
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30574 36290
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	634 326
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5437 6222

Compare specifications (specs)