Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A580 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 326.4 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 744 vs 589
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91409 vs 78982
- Around 22% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2229 vs 1821
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 817 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 744 vs 589 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91409 vs 78982 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2229 vs 1821 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13253 vs 11903
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 vs 11903 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 744 | 589 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11903 | 13253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91409 | 78982 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2229 | 1821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 143.293 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Code name | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 149 | 144 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1282 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 817 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.44 TFLOPS | 9.846 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 163.2 GPixel/s | 61.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s | 153.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 12000 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
