Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A580 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 326.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 2022 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 58% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 3072
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 723
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20548 vs 11523
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 85922
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 723 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20548 vs 11523 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107110 vs 85922 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11523 | 20548 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85922 | 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11653 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-512 | GA104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 102 | 101 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.44 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 163.2 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |