Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A580 and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 326.4 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 2022 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- 2x more pipelines: 6144 vs 3072
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1002 vs 731
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19428 vs 11668
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123297 vs 89665
- Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11043 vs 10867
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 3072 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1002 vs 731 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19428 vs 11668 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123297 vs 89665 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11043 vs 10867 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A580
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 | 1002 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11668 | 19428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89665 | 123297 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10867 | 11043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-512 | GA104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 12 Apr 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 109 | 106 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.44 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 163.2 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 300 Watt |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |