Intel Arc A730M vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A730M and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A730M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1464.3x more texture fill rate: 393.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9808 vs 9496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 24 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 393.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9808 vs 9496 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 802 vs 565
- 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 802 vs 565 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 1732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A730M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A730M | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70573 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 | 802 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9808 | 9496 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1732 | 5170 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A730M | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | DG2-512 | Fiji |
| Launch date | 2022 | 24 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 219 | 216 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.60 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 196.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 393.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 191 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A730M with others
IntelArc A730M vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
IntelArc A730M vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
IntelArc A730M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
IntelArc A730M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
IntelArc A730M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
IntelArc A730M vs
AMDRadeon 740M
