Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1860 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 552.246 vs 259.78
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 27 Jan 2022 |
| Core clock speed | 2100 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1860 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 552.246 vs 259.78 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 614.4 GTexel/s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 10752 vs 4096
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1227 vs 753
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 29502 vs 13175
- Around 93% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5741 vs 2969
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 206084 vs 108639
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.049 vs 36.277
- 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 177.665 vs 19.001
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3026.082 vs 1958.986
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 614.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 vs 4096 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1227 vs 753 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 29502 vs 13175 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5741 vs 2969 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 206084 vs 108639 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.049 vs 36.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 177.665 vs 19.001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3026.082 vs 1958.986 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 1227 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13175 | 29502 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2969 | 5741 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 108639 | 206084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 552.246 | 259.78 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4822.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.277 | 63.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.001 | 177.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1958.986 | 3026.082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Code name | DG2-512 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 27 Jan 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | 98 | 25 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1860 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2100 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.66 TFLOPS | 40.00 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 10752 |
| Pixel fill rate | 307.2 GPixel/s | 208.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s | 625.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 625.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 850 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
| Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
